Region:Asia
Author(s):Madhur Chopra
Product Code:KR937
By Type of Trauma Implant (Internal and External Fixation): Since internal fixation devices have more post surgery advantages in terms of independence of movement, the segment dominated in terms of revenue during 2018, followed by the external fixation segment in Asia orthopedic device market.
Ø By Type of Spinal Implant (Fusion and Non-Fusion): Fusion devices still make up the largest market share among spinal devices segment, followed by the non-fusion spinal implants in 2018.
Ø By Type of Joint Implant (Knee, Hip and Others): The joint market is majorly dominated by Knee and hip with hip being the largest revenue making segment in Asia orthopedic device market during 2018. As number of arthritis cases is increasing in the Asian region, the market for knee implants will also grow in the near future.
By Country
By Type of Treatment
By Type of Joint Implant
By Type of Spinal Implant
Asia Pacific Region
2.1. Market Definitions
2.2. Abbreviations
2.3. Market Size and Modeling
2.4Market Sizing – Asia pacific Orthopedic Device Market (Similar Sample considered for Country Level Profiling)
2.5Variables for Orthopedic Devices (Dependent and Independent) in China
2.6Multi Factor Based Sensitivity Model
2.7Regression Matrix
2.8Limitations
2.9Final Conclusion
3.1Market Stage
3.2Situation of Domestic Sector
3.3Dominance of Imported Products
3.4Industry Life Cycle - Emerging, Growth and Mature Phase
3.5Cross Comparison of Major Countries (China, Japan, Korea and India) in Asia Pacific Orthopedic Device Market Including Revenue, 3.6Historical Growth Rate (2013-2018) and Forecasted Growth Rate (2018-2025), Competitive Structure and Major Segments
3.7Cross Comparison of Major Countries (China, Japan, Korea and India) in Asia Pacific Orthopedic Device Market Including Geriatric 3.8Population, Number of Road Accidents, Number of Passenger Vehicle and Number of Orthopedic Hospitals, 2018
(Supply Side Ecosystem - Major Manufacturers, Major Researchers, Major Venture Capitalists and Major Professional Societies of Orthopedic Devices)
(Demand Side Ecosystem - Major Healthcare Providers of Orthopedic Services in China, India, Korea and Japan)
(Direct to Physician and Distributors to Physician Business Model - Revenue Streams, Profit / Commission Margin and Key Partners)
Cross Comparison of Business Models (Direct to Physician Business Model and Distributor to Physician Business Model) Including Major Companies, Source of Revenue, Model Robustness, Challenges and Advantages
(Flowchart and Problems and Issues Including Geopolitical Issues, Limited Reach of Distributors, and Inventory Discrepancies)
8.1. By Country (China, Japan, Australia, Korea, India, Taiwan, Thailand, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Pakistan, Indonesia, Bangladesh and the Philippines), 2013-2018
8.2. By Type of Sourcing (Import and Local Manufacturing), 2013-2018
Cross Comparison of Type of Sourcing (Import and Local Manufacturing) in Asia Pacific Orthopedic Market on the basis of Quality, Margin (%) for Distributors, Delivery Time, Training and Education, Administrative Duties, Pain Points and Major Implants
8.3. By Type of Device (Joint, Trauma, Spine, CMF, Ortho-Biology and Sports Medicine), 2013-2018
Cross Comparison By Type of Devices (Joint, Trauma, Spine, CMF, Ortho-Biology and Sports Medicine) Including Market Size in USD Million, Historical CAGR (2013-2018), Competition Structure, Major Regions, Emerging Markets, Complexity Involved in Manu-facturing, Type of Surgery, Major Growth Drivers, Pricing, Pain Points, Major Players and Major End Users
8.3.1. By Type of Spinal Implant (Fusion and Non-Fusion), 2018
Cross Comparison by Type of Spinal Implants (Fusion and Non-Fusion) Including Market Size in USD Million, Impact on the APAC Region, Pricing for Implant in USD, Cost of Surgery in USD, Complication Post Surgery, Success Rate Post Surgery and Complexity of Surgery
8.3.2. By Type of Trauma Implant (Internal and External Fixation), 2018
Cross Comparison by Type of Trauma Implants (Internal Fixation and External Fixation) in Asia Pacific Orthopedic Market Including Market Size in USD Million, Impact on the APAC Region, Pricing, Major Companies, Maintenance Post Surgery and Adoption Rate
8.3.3. By Type of Joint Implant (Knee, Hip and Others), 2018
Cross Comparison by Type of Joint Implant (Knee, Hip and Others) in Asia Pacific Orthopedic Device Market Including Market Size in USD Million, Major Regions, Competition Structure, Major Players and Cost of Surgery in USD
8.4. By Type of End Users (Multispecialty and Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals), 2018
9.1. China Orthopedic Device Market, 2013-2023
9.1.1. Key Takeaways
9.1.2. Market Overview and Size on the Basis of Revenue, 2013-2018
Geriatric population to Drive the Market Demand in China
9.1.3. SWOT Analysis of China Orthopedic Market
9.1.4. China Orthopedic Device Market Segmentation, 2013-2018
By Type of Sourcing (Import and Local Manufacturing), 2013-2018
By Type of Treatment (Joint, Trauma, Spine, Orthobiology and sports Medicine) 2013-2018
By Type of Joint implant (Knee, Hip and others), 2018
By Type of Spine implant (Fusion and Non Fusion), 2018
By Type of Trauma implant (Internal and External Fixation), 2018
By Type of End Users (Multispecialty Hospitals and Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals), 2018
9.1.5. Competitive Landscape
Heat Map of Domestic Players (Weiago, Double Medical, Kelly, Chunli, and tech, Canwell, Sanyou, Waston, Ak Medical, Naton and Microport) by Type of Treatment (Joints, Spine and Trauma)
Market Share of Major Companies (Johnson, Jie Tibang, Ssek, Medtronic and Xerox) in Overall Market on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Stryker, J&J, Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, and Others) in Trauma Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Stryker, J&J, Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, Medtronic, and Others) in Spine Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Stryker, J&J, Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, Medtronic and Others) in Joint Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
9.1.6. Future Outlook and Projections, 2018-2025
By Type of Sourcing (Import and Local Manufacturing), 2019P-2025F
By Type of Treatment (Joint, Trauma, Spine, Orthobiology and sports Medicine), 2019P-2025F
By Type of Joint Implant (Knee, Hip and others), 2025(F)
By Type of Spine Implant (Fusion and Non Fusion), 2025(F)
By Type of Trauma implant (Internal and External Fixation), 2025(F)
By Type of End Users (Multispecialty Hospitals and Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals), 2025(F)
9.2. India Orthopedic Device market
9.2.1. Key Takeaways
9.2.2. Market Overview and Size on the Basis of Revenue, 2013-2018
Increasing Cost of Surgery in India
9.2.3. SWOT Analysis
9.2.4. Market Segmentation
By Type of Sourcing (Import and Local Manufacturing), 2018
By Type of Treatment (Joint, Trauma, Spine, Orthobiology and Sports Medicine), 2018
By Type of Joint Implant (Knee, Hip and others), 2018
By Type of Spine Implant (Fusion and Non Fusion), 2018
By Type of Trauma Implant (Internal and External Fixation), 2018
By Type of End Users (Multispecialty and orthopedic Hospitals), 2018
9.2.5. Competitive Landscape of Indian Orthopedic market
Cross Comparison of India with Developed Nations (France, UK, and USA) Including Product based reimbursement/co-payment, Bundled/Package Rates, Device Pricing and Price Capping
Heat Map of Domestic (Narang Medical, ASCO and Atlas Surgical) and Foreign Players (Stryker, Zimmer, Conmed)
Market Share of Major Companies (Biomet, Smith and Nephew, J&J, Stryker and others) in Overall Market on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Biomet, Smith and Nephew, J&J, Stryker and others) Operating in Joint Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Biomet, Smith and Nephew, J&J, Stryker and others) Operating in Trauma Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Biomet, Smith and Nephew, J&J, Stryker and others) Operating in Spine Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
9.2.6. Future Outlook and Projections, 2019-2025
By Type of Treatment (Joint, Trauma, Spine, Orthobiology and sports Medicine), 2019(P)-2025(F)
By Type of Joint Implant, (Knee, Hip, and Others), 2025(F)
By Type of Spine Implant (Fusion and Non Fusion), 2025(F)
By Type of Trauma Implant
By Type of End Users, (Multispecialty and orthopedic Hospitals), 2025(F)
9.3. Japan Orthopedic Device Market, 2013-2023
9.3.1. Key Takeaways
9.3.2. Market Overview and Size on the Basis of Revenue, 2013-2018
Increase in Number of Road Accidents Involving Elderly Population
9.3.3. SWOT Analysis
9.3.4. Market Segmentation, 2018
By Type of Sourcing (Import and Local Manufacturing), 2018
By Type of Treatment (Joint, Trauma, Spine, Orthobiology and Sports Medicine), 2018
By Type of Joint Implant (Knee, Hip, and Others), 2018
By Type of Spine Implant (Fusion and Non Fusion), 2018
By Type of Trauma implant (Internal and External Fixation), 2018
By Type of End Users (Multispecialty Hospitals and Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals), 2018
9.3.5. Competitive Landscape in Japan Orthopedic Device Market
Market Share of Major Companies (Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, J&J, Stryker, Kyocera, JMDM and others) in overall market on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, J&J, Stryker, TEM and others) Operating in Trauma Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Medtronic, Nuvasive, globus, J&J, and others) Operating in Spine Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies Stryker, J&J, Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, Microport, Kyocera and Others) Operating in Joint Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
9.3.6. Future Outlook and Projections, 2018-2025
By Type of Treatment (Joint, Trauma, Spine, Orthobilogy and Sports Medicine), 2019(P)-2025(F)
By Type of Joint Implant (Knee, Hip, and Others), 2025(F)
By Type of Spine Implant (Fusion and Non Fusion), 2025 (F)
By Type of Trauma Implant (Internal and External Fixation), 2025(F)
By Type of End Users Multispecialty Hospitals and Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals), 2025(F)
9.4. Korea Orthopedic Medical Device Market
9.4.1. Key Takeaways
9.4.2. Market Overview and Size on the Basis of Revenue, 2013-2018
3-D Printing to Boost Local Production and Domestic Market
9.4.3. SWOT Analysis
9.4.4. Market Segmentation, 2018
By Type of Treatment (Joint, Trauma, Spine, Orthobiology and Sports Medicine), 2018
By Type of Joint implant (Knee, Hip and Others), 2018
By Type of Spine implant (Fusion and Non Fusion), 2018
By Type of Trauma implant (Internal and External Fixation), 2018
By Type of End Users (Multispecialty Hospitals and Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals), 2018
9.4.5. Competitive Landscape in South Korea Orthopedic Device Market
9.4.6. Future Outlook and Projections
By Type of Treatment (Joint, Trauma, Spine, Orthobilogy and Sports Medicine), 2025(F)
By Type of Joint Implant (Knee, Hipand Others), 2025(F)
By Type of Spine Implant (Fusion and Non Fusion), 2025(F)
By Type of Trauma Implant (Internal and External Fixation), 2025(F)
By Type of End Users (Multispecialty Hospitals and Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals), 2025(F)
11.1Increasing Geriatric population
11.2Increasing Sedentary Lifestyle in Asian Countries
11.3Increasing Road Accidents in South East Asian Countries
12. Trends and Developments and Issues and Challenges
12.1Mergers and Acquisitions at Asia Pacific
12.2Innovative Products and Procedures Due to Increase in R&D
12.3Demand For Minimal Invasive Surgeries in Asian Countries
12.4High Medical Care Costs in Asian Regions
12.5Increasing Competition from Domestic manufacturers
14.1. Strength and Weakness of Major Players (Stryker, J&J, Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, Medtronic, and Others)
14.2. Market Share of Major Players (Stryker, J&J, Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, Medtronic, and Others) in Overall Market on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Stryker, J&J, Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, and Others) in Overall Market on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Stryker, J&J, Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, and Others) in Trauma Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Stryker, J&J, Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, and Others) in Spine Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
Market Share of Major Companies (Stryker, J&J, Zimmer Biomet, Smith and Nephew, and Others) in Joints Segment on the Basis of Revenue, 2018
14.3. Cross Comparison of Major Players (Including Number of Distributors, Major Markets, Number of Employees, Primary Customers and Major Segments)
15. Company Profiles (Including Company Overview, USP, Business Strategies, Regions of
Operation, Subsidiaries, Distribution, Best Products and Manufacturing Locations)
15.1. Stryker Corporation
15.2. Zimmer Biomet
15.3. J&J (DePuy Synthes)
15.4. Smith and Nephew
15.5. Medtronic
16.1. By Country (China, Japan, Australia, Korea, India, Taiwan, Thailand, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Pakistan, Indonesia, Bangladesh and the Philippines), 2019(P)-2025(F)
16.2. By Type of Treatment (Joint, Trauma, Spine, Orthobilogy and Sports Medicine), 2019(P)-2025(F)
By Type of Joint implant (Knee, Hip, and Others), 2025(F)
By Type of Trauma implant (Internal and External Fixation), 2025(F)
By Type of Spine implant (Fusion and Non-Fusion), 2025(F)
16.5. By Type of End Users (Multispecialty Hospitals and Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals), 2025(F)
Suggestion 1: Spreading Awareness via Instagram and other social media platforms
Suggestion 2: Building a Pipeline of influencers in Rural Areas
Suggestion 3: Training Local Healthcare Workers and Doctors for the Usage of Products
What makes us stand out is that our consultants follows Robust, Refine and Result (RRR) methodology. i.e. Robust for clear definitions, approaches and sanity checking, Refine for differentiating respondents facts and opinions and Result for presenting data with story
We have set a benchmark in the industry by offering our clients with syndicated and customized market research reports featuring coverage of entire market as well as meticulous research and analyst insights.
While we don't replace traditional research, we flip the method upside down. Our dual approach of Top Bottom & Bottom Top ensures quality deliverable by not just verifying company fundamentals but also looking at the sector and macroeconomic factors.
With one step in the future, our research team constantly tries to show you the bigger picture. We help with some of the tough questions you may encounter along the way: How is the industry positioned? Best marketing channel? KPI's of competitors? By aligning every element, we help maximize success.
Our report gives you instant access to the answers and sources that other companies might choose to hide. We elaborate each steps of research methodology we have used and showcase you the sample size to earn your trust.
If you need any support, we are here! We pride ourselves on universe strength, data quality, and quick, friendly, and professional service.